Thursday July 29, 2010

ephilosopher.com is an online community dedicated to philosophical thinking. Login or become a member!

From our forums

Re:A New Definition of Determinism649 views15 repliespeacegirl29.7.2010 9:37
Re:On Moral Realism...662 views15 repliesYadaYada29.7.2010 4:38
Re:In the beginning there was everything.219 views4 repliesbitula329.7.2010 3:45
Why Science Is Not Part of Culture51 views0 repliesPentcho29.7.2010 3:44
Re:Ayn Rand and radical evil24222 views471 repliesneither/nor29.7.2010 2:18
Re:Ensteiniana and Journalists' Honesty200 views3 repliesPentcho29.7.2010 1:36
Re:life worth living?2887 views31 repliesPlotin29.7.2010 0:51
Re:Does God enjoy evil?304 views7 repliesGreatest I am28.7.2010 14:24
More...

Quotables

If you can't say it clearly, you don't understand it yourself -- John Searle
Home
News Feeds:
29
Jul
2010
He joins the chorus. If anyone competent in the philosophical and scientific issues has had anything favorable to say about the argument of this book anywhere, please send me a link.

 
29
Jul
2010
Lots of readers have sent me links to this video of a Classics & Near Eastern Studies professor making a forceful statement before the Board of Regents about the financial priorities of the university, administrative bloat, and other malignant signs...

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 455

Chat Box

Latest Message: 1 day, 23 hours ago
  • Cado : Five day moment of silence. I figured I would have had to learn how to write and express my thoughts through typing before I was missed on here. It seems my ignorance is worthy after all ;)
  • Msafwan : No silence for you. No silence death without an honor! Kaplah!! (waaargh!)
  • JK713 : Moment of silence anyone?
  • Cado : Now I remember why I left school. There is no heart here. It was fun, wake up, and sorry for any negative emotions you might have felt. Peace!
  • JK713 : philosophy: Investigation of the nature, causes, or principles of reality, knowledge, or values, based on logical reasoning rather than empirical methods
  • Cado : Are there any Stoics here? Are there any who believe in altruism in ethics? Are there any at all who are truly virtuous? It seems so far that everyone talks, and through there words it becomes known that they do not actualy DO philosophy unless they believe doing philosophy is simply thinking logicaly and talking. But what of true philosophical action, what we now call applied philosophy?
  • JK713 : This site is always cyclical in nature. Now that I'm back things will pick up again.
  • funkgunk : 'I think this site has died - at least for the time-being' would seem so
  • Msafwan : No it is not. It is alive, it is alive! ngehahaha!
  • Sam26 : I think this site has died - at least for the time-being
  • Sam26 : No
  • yanshien : Anyone here?
  • yanshien : 有没有使用汉语的人?
  • Szavieur : This chat box reminds me of the dead in the dark world in the last "His Dark Materials" novel.
  • Spar : Anyone here?
  • Szavieur : A lot of 'em've left us. :(
  • Sam26 : I haven't seen Td around - has he left us?
  • Sam26 : You know, you could be right
  • JK713 : Perhaps you had solved it in between your statement, and my asking if you had. It's not my fault you're not very efficient.
  • Sam26 : If I solved it, then it wouldn't be a quandary
  • JK713 : Well have you solved it then?
  • Sam26 : My life is a philosophical quandary
  • JK713 : So.. anyone solve any philosophical quandries lately?
  • Garbangw : «link» «link» «link» «link» «link»
  • Szavieur : Well, I feel at home on Earth (sort of), but I also constantly feel this strange feeling. I do have a theory about the meaning of these emotions but that's for my thread more than this chat box... I don't know how to connect this up with your scientist example, though.

Only registered users are allowed to post

Online

2 users and 679 guests online

Latest Comments

© 2010 by ephilosopher.com. All Rights Reserved.