docjp
Junior Boarder
Posts: 75
|
|
Re:Esophilosophy, a new field of study... 2 Years ago
|
Karma: 1
|
|
Regarding: "all possible outcomes with uneven distribution of probabilities"...
The Law of Karma is separate from Conscience, Discretion, Knowledge and Empathetic Understanding, or CDK&EU.
The completion of Karma accrues to CDK&EU, but this is not "uneven", it is Absolutely relative to the action taken. Inherent in the "corrective process" for the zeal of the "fittest" is a built-in diminishing of "fittest" nature. The "fittest" nature thus manifests itself in but one life of an individual, going forward that Soul would no longer be part of the "fittest" "subset".
It is often difficult to "think" about multiple dimensions of Man simultaneously existing and only one of these capable of being perceived via ones brain.
Peace
|
|
|
|
 Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
docjp
Junior Boarder
Posts: 75
|
|
Re:Esophilosophy, a new field of study... 10 Months, 3 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 1
|
|
Jayranger wrote:
If this knowledge cannot adhere to the basic construct of verificationism or falsificationism, then it cannot be a sustained field of study,
Out of interest, could you possibly give me a definition of clarity regarding what is 'esoteric knowledge'?
"Definition"? Is it possible for someone unfamiliar with the phenomenon called "Intuition" to "know" what Intuition is... if he is given abstract words that point to, but cannot possibly provide the "experience" of Intuition?
Peace
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
docjp
Junior Boarder
Posts: 75
|
|
Re:Esophilosophy, a new field of study... 10 Months, 3 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 1
|
|
lem wrote:
I believe there was only one Buddhaso you're not a buddhist? right??
I appreciate that an opinion has to do with what a person "thinks". I am suggesting that Eso-philosophy would not deal with thinking, or opinion, but only Truth, which I Know is Spiritual in nature.it seems pretty clear that you've misunderstood what i've said unless you're accusing the whole history of religious thinkers of being charlatans or that somehow they don't Know the Truth that you do.
.
If I gave the impression that I was "accusing" anyone of being dishonest, I do apologize. That a limited number of people appreciate the difference between religion and Spirituality is, I believe a fact. I believe also a limited number of people routinely differentiate between what the brain can know, and what it cannot know. Psychologists continually cut the physical brain into smaller and smaller pieces in an attempt to find the MIND. Does this make them "charlatans"? Or simply people who have not been taught that the MIND is Esoteric, and thus incapable of being perceived by the brain?
Peace
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
docjp
Junior Boarder
Posts: 75
|
|
Re:Esophilosophy, a new field of study... 10 Months, 3 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 1
|
|
Jayranger wrote:
Out of interest, have you read any literature on the scientific theories regarding the mind and the universe or any psychology books that deal with human reactions to things like religion, spiritualism, that sort of thing, or have you purely being reading spiritualist literature? I only say this because as clearly strong as your view for the validity of this field of study appears to be, there is a lot of jargon that is difficult for a non-spiritualist to get their head around (hence my request for definitions), and I'd be interested to know whether you have consulted external, more scientific, stimuli before coming to this conclusion regarding esoteric knowledge.
The most difficult task for me is to find a way to encourage others to accept that there are some things their brains simply cannot perceive. The brain is physical. This means it can perceive things that are physical. And of little interest to "SCIENCE" is the fact that 3/4ths of Man and of Life are not physical. The MIND of Man is composed of a lower MIND [composed of Astral region energy], and a higher MIND [composed of Causal region energy]. This means the entire MIND is not part of this physical universe. Then there is the Spiritual dimension, and this dimension is incapable of being perceived by the brain, and it is also incapable of being experienced by the MIND.
May I ask what "more scientific" source specializes in the Esoteric dimensions of Man or of Life?
Peace
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
docjp
Junior Boarder
Posts: 75
|
|
Re:Esophilosophy, a new field of study... 10 Months, 3 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 1
|
|
Jayranger wrote:
[quote]Karma is the presupposed idea that the universe has a spiritual order, and yet basic evolutionary theory and quantum mechanics essentially proves this idea not to be the case. [quote]
Would you be so kind as to explain how quantum mechanics "proves" the Law of Karma is not an Absolute? Since Absolutes only exist in the Spiritual dimension.. which is incapable of being perceived by the brain?
Peace
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
docjp
Junior Boarder
Posts: 75
|
|
Re:Esophilosophy, a new field of study... 10 Months, 3 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 1
|
YadaYada wrote:
This new field of study utilizes the faculty of intuition, and is not capable of being studied by the brain and thinking.
Is a cat's faculty of intuition the same kind as my mother-in-law's? If not, then what's the diference?
What you perceive of the "cat's intuition" is often referred to as "instinct", and this is the intellectual's way of naming something that is not comprehended. The cat has a MIND, and that MIND will accompany the Soul of that cat throughout its exploration of Creation. Source: Eastern mysticism. I cannot speak to your mother-in-law?
It is no doubt difficult for an intellectual to accept that there is a higher and more precise means of comprehending Life that the brain and thinking. That means is the faculty of Intuition, which is an aspect of ones Apapsyche [ about-psychology.com/apapsyche.html ], or the Operational Energy of ones Soul. Now, the terms MIND, Soul, Intuition, and Apapsyche are all Esoteric [which means non-physical] and thus, incapable of being comprehended by the brain... except by use of abstract words, symbols, or concepts. But abstractions do not lend themselves to "proof" of anything. This is where Intuition is necessary.
Peace
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
|
Facebook.com
Twitter.com
