YadaYada wrote:
UEAPHD wrote: An argument is logical if its inferences are in accordance with the rules of logic. That's all that "logical" means.
I presume you are limiting this definition to elementary binary deductive logic, AKA Aristotelean logic, AKA Boolean logic?
Could you not also be forced to grant that binary inductive (or binary probabilistic) logic, multi-valued (rather than binary) logic, analog logic (logic of continuous values), neural (networked) logic, and quantum logic are also logics, but for its own specialized (simplified) reasons your textbook failed to mention them?
It's not really limiting the definition. Even in the areas you mention, "logical" means the same thing: in accordance with the rules of inference (whatever those rules might be). The only reason I brought up arguments is because I assumed that Plotin was talking about deductive logic as this is what the title of the thread suggests. That said I am finding it difficult to understand much of what's being posted in this forum so maybe I got it wrong. Perhaps Plotin should reiterate.
I don't have a textbook, by the way. I have about 40. That's probably why I don't have a girlfriend.
