pljames wrote:
I mean to understand without question=absolute. Logic to me to be understood without doubt or argument.pljames
It's still not clear what you mean. Are you saying that the rules of logic are beyond doubt or question? If this is what you mean then it simply isn't true. The rules of logic are constantly questioned and criticised by logicians particularly when they yield conclusions which violate intuition (this gives rise to logical paradoxes). Thus, the rules of inference are are not immune to criticism, nor should we think of them as such if we have good reason.
