Zero wrote:
No, nameless, I think you'll find it was a joke.
Ahhh, the defender puppy again!
No, I saw no implication of humor. Besides the attempt to excuse poor thinking/fallacy as humor is rather pathetic.

A fallacy is an error of reasoning. Fence simply made a few unqualified assertions.
Perhaps you should have asked me to elucidate, just in case I might have seen something that you missed.

There were no inferences.
That YOU perceived, anyway.

So nothing he said can be fallacious.
Perhaps you should have asked me to elucidate, just in case I might have seen something that you missed.

What he said could be <em>false</em>, mind, but it's nothing less than a category error to use the word fallacious the way you did.
You build a failed argument on poorly understood premises. The whole juvenile blurt could have been, perhaps, avoided, had you; asked me to elucidate, just in case I might have seen something that you missed. Then, after you understand what I am saying, then you can refute (if you can).
Thats how philosophy works. Understand what you criticize, otherwise simply inquire until you do.

<strong>Zero wrote:</strong>
Yep. Troll.

Okay, I'm done.
Good (but somehow I doubt it).

Bye the bye, the abrasive and dramatically ego threatening style (use of the term 'stupid', for instance, with something that people agree and identify with) with which I opened this thread, was for the explicit purpose of bypassing the trivial banter and get right into people (in their egoic state) illustrating my point exactly, which is adequately accomplished.
Sorry about the ego threatening/wounding in which I had to go about it.
Please dont stalk me around the board.

LOL/test