Vero
Senior Boarder
Posts: 199
|
|
Polemics 4 Years, 3 Months ago
|
Karma: 0
|
|
Polemics ruin philosophy, true or false?
|
|
|
|
 Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
Fence
Latinum Hoarder,
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 1816
|
|
Re: Polemics 4 Years, 3 Months ago
|
Karma: 4
|
|
If by polemics you still mean "Arguments against my favoured positions", then no, I'd say they don't.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
What we cannot speak of we must pass over in silence.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
|
|
|
Re: Polemics 4 Years, 3 Months ago
|
Karma: 0
|
|
Actual polemics usually are high on prejudicial
phrasing, fallacies, and BS techniques.
So...the extent to which they are bad argumentation
can be critiqued effectively point-by-point.
Some "polemics" might be a post summarizing a
lot drawn-out getting-fed-up process. In that case
they ought to be considered by the prior traffic they
refer to.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
|
|
|
Re: Polemics 4 Years, 2 Months ago
|
Karma: 0
|
|
[quote1205679241=leonardomend]
Actual polemics usually are high on prejudicial
phrasing, fallacies, and BS techniques.
So...the extent to which they are bad argumentation
can be critiqued effectively point-by-point.
Some "polemics" might be a post summarizing a
lot drawn-out getting-fed-up process. In that case
they ought to be considered by the prior traffic they
refer to.
[/quote1205679241]
As I explained in a different thread, you are using the pejorative notion of polemics. Polemics do not necessarily entail the techniques that you mention. Have a look at a definition of polemics.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
|
Facebook.com
Twitter.com
