Watching cases no one else cares about |
|
|
|
|
Written by <a href='/community/profile/62-admin/'>Administrator</a>
|
|
Wednesday, 21 April 2010 02:30 |
|
While everyone (including me) is talking about yesterdays decision in the dog-fighting case or Mondays oral argument in Christian Legal Society, I am all about this mornings argument in Krupski v. Costa Crociere, a case from the Eleventh Circuit that deals with relation back of amended pleadings under Rule 15(c) and what constitutes a "mistake concerning the proper partys identity." In part this is because I helped moot the respondents attorney here in Miami. A plaintiff who was injured while on a cruise ship initially sued the cruise line rather than the owner/operator of the ship, then sought to amend...
Trackback(0)
 |