Jordi Ferrer, professor of legal phylosophy at the University of Girona (Spain) is organizing a conference celebrating the 50th volume of the series “Philosophy and Law”, published by Marcial Pons Publisher, which he co-edits together with Professor José Juan Moreso (University “Pompeu Fabra”, Barcelona). The website of the congress is the following:



The congress, devoted to the topic “Neutrality and Theory of Law”, will take place the 20th, 21st and 22nd of May 2010 in the Spanish city of Girona. The conference is conceived of as a meeting place for authors and readers of our books and topics. For this reason twelve authors from the collection will be speakers at the event Dr. Robert Alexy, Dr. Juan C. Bayón, Dr. Brian Bix, Dr. Eugenio Bulygin, Dr. Bruno Celano, Dr. Jules L. Coleman, Dr. Riccardo Guastini, Dr. Brian Leiter, Dr. Jorge Luis Rodríguez, Dr. Frederick Schauer, Dr. Scott J. Shapiro, Dr. Wilfrid J. Waluchow. Our objective is to offer an event of great importance in the legal- philosophical debate that will gather and try to bridge different legal traditions.

Public Reason "is a new blog for political philosophers and theorists. The purpose of the blog is to create an open forum for the academic political philosophy and theory community where we can discuss our common work. Academic blogging has undergone a remarkable growth lately. A group blog, in particular, can be used as a tool to continue the conversations that begin on the journal pages and in the conference halls.

There are two types of user status at Public Reason: participants and members.

Parti cipants have the ability to comment on posts. To register as a participant, you must be affiliated with an academic institution in some way. For instance, present or former students of political thought may register and participate in discussion. To register as a participant at the site, please follow this link. Please keep in mind that your registration may take some time to be approved.



[ Read the rest... ]

Douglas E. Edlin (ed.), Common Law Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 247pp., $80.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780521846424.

W.J. Waluchow: ". . .if common law is case law, precisely where in legal cases are common law rules to be found? Among the most theoretically troubling features of such rules -- assuming that they do indeed exist -- is that they are not canonically formulated in the manner of statutory rules. Judges seldom formulate anything remotely like what we normally think of as a rule when they decide cases. Rather, they explain and defend their decisions by citing reasons, doctrines, precedents, and so on. Often they cite what appear to be moral, political and social considerations. But these are not the kinds of things we normally think of as legal rules; rather they seem to be factors one could draw on to support the adoption, application, alteration or rejection of such rules. And so our question remains: where precisely do we locate common law rules? And then there is this peculiar feature of common law rules: they are quite often capable of revision in the very act of application by a judge, a respect in which they seem quite unlike, say, statutory rules which judges are not free to change. How can rules, revisable at point of application, be intelligently thought of as legally "binding" on a decision-maker? Indeed, can they sensibly be said to be rules at all? . . ." more

Jesse Prinz, The Emotional Construction of Morals, Oxford University Press, 2007, 334pp., $60.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780199283019.

Ronald de Sousa, University of Toronto: "Is the good a projection of our preferences, or are our preferences correct or incorrect according to their correspondence to some objective good, independent of our minds? The question goes back to Plato's Euthyphro. There have been major hitters on both sides, and it is one of the many scandals of philosophy that the debate drags on. Jesse Prinz's brilliant new book is a detailed and convincing defense of a fresh variant of the projectionist view, in which emotional responses, particularly approbation and disapprobation, constitute the core content of moral judgments. The view is refined in such a way as to embrace the possibility of moral truth, and answer a large array of objections. Its relativist consequences are embraced, and independently supported with a wide range of psychological and anthropological evidence. Prinz shows, however, that even full fledged relativism does not exclude viable notions of moral debate and moral progress." more

"Genres, Categories, and Concepts in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art" May 16-18, 2008 Indiana University, Bloomington   This conference will investigate the particular roles of various types of categorization in the production, experience, and appreciation of works of art. Specific topics include:       * the legitimacy of cross‐categoria l comparison of artworks     * gender in the horror genre: "feminist final girls"     * Collingwood on the distinction between art and craft     * generic resetting in rock covers     * Herder on sculpture     * nuance as a category‐indepe ndent aesthetic property     * Schopenhauer on “genres that matter”: tragedy and still life     * comics as literary/visual hybrid           Amy Coplan (Cal State, Fullerton)         Nicholas Diehl (University of California, Davis)         Jonathan Friday (Kent University, UK)         Ted Gracyk (Minnesota State, Moorhead)         Matthew Kieran (Leeds University, UK)         Aaron Meskin (Leeds University, UK)         Michael Morgan (Indiana University)         Alex Neill (University of Southampton, UK)         Henry Pratt (Marist College, USA)         Aaron Ridley (University of Southampton, UK)         Michael Rings (Indiana University)         Tiger Roholt (Indiana University of Pennsylvania)         Sandy Shapshay (Indiana University)         Joshua Shaw (Penn State, Erie)         Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern University, USA)   Visit conference website at: http:// www.indiana.edu /~aesthete/ For further information or registration, contact: mrings@indiana. edu   Sponsored by the College Arts Humanities Institute and the Indiana University Department of Philosophy. Co-sponsored by the Indiana University Departments of Communication and Culture, English, Germanic Studies, Spanish and Portuguese, West European Studies, and the Fundamental Studio Area of the School of Fine Arts      
[Submitted by Michael Rings]