Wednesday May 16, 2012

ephilosopher.com is an online community dedicated to philosophical thinking. Login or become a member!

Home
Articles
Community
- Register
- Groups
- Profile
- Search
- Videos
- Events
Forums
Links
Games
Contact us
Help
Blog

Be Social

From our forums

Einsteiniana: No Understanding Is Necessary	12 views	0 replies	Pentcho	16.5.2012 18:04
Re: Einsteiniana: Two Crucial Questions	58 views	1 replies	Pentcho	16.5.2012 9:12
Does somebody know what Vacuum is ?	24 views	0 replies	socrat	16.5.2012 3:23
Re: Einsteiniana: The Fatal Argument	101 views	3 replies	Pentcho	15.5.2012 17:00
Why they do not use sentences, to describe gadgets	42 views	0 replies	kowalskil	14.5.2012 20:21
Re: Gravitational Redshift and Speed of Light	92 views	3 replies	Pentcho	12.5.2012 9:41
Re: Variable Speed of Light in Einsteiniana	153 views	5 replies	Pentcho	9.5.2012 14:01
Re: Violations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics	119 views	2 replies	Pentcho	9.5.2012 6:09

More...

Quotables

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side; if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion. -- John Stuart Mill

Home

News Feeds:

Nov

2008

Public Reason

Public Reason "is a new blog for political philosophers and theorists. The purpose of the blog is to create an open forum for the academic political philosophy and theory community where we can discuss our common work. Academic blogging has undergone a remarkable growth lately. A group blog, in particular, can be used as a tool to continue the conversations that begin on the journal pages and in the conference halls. There are two types of user status at Public Reason: participants and members. Participants have the ability to comment on posts. To register as a participant, you must be affiliated with an academic institution in some way. For instance, present or former students of political thought may register and participate in discussion. To register as a participant at the site, please follow this link. Please keep in mind that your registration may take some time to be approved.

Add comment (1)

Aug

2008

Common Law Theory

Douglas E. Edlin (ed.), Common Law Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 247pp., $80.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780521846424. W.J. Waluchow: ". . .if common law is case law, precisely where in legal cases are common law rules to be found? Among the most theoretically troubling features of such rules -- assuming that they do indeed exist -- is that they are not canonically formulated in the manner of statutory rules. Judges seldom formulate anything remotely like what we normally think of as a rule when they decide cases. Rather, they explain and defend their decisions by citing reasons, doctrines, precedents, and so on. Often they cite what appear to be moral, political and social considerations. But these are not the kinds of things we normally think of as legal rules; rather they seem to be factors one could draw on to support the adoption, application, alteration or rejection of such rules. And so our question remains: where precisely do we locate common law rules? And then there is this peculiar feature of common law rules: they are quite often capable of revision in the very act of application by a judge, a respect in which they seem quite unlike, say, statutory rules which judges are not free to change. How can rules, revisable at point of application, be intelligently thought of as legally "binding" on a decision-maker? Indeed, can they sensibly be said to be rules at all? . . ." more

Add comment (1)

Jun

2008

The Emotional Construction of Morals

Jesse Prinz, The Emotional Construction of Morals, Oxford University Press, 2007, 334pp., $60.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780199283019. Ronald de Sousa, University of Toronto: "Is the good a projection of our preferences, or are our preferences correct or incorrect according to their correspondence to some objective good, independent of our minds? The question goes back to Plato's Euthyphro. There have been major hitters on both sides, and it is one of the many scandals of philosophy that the debate drags on. Jesse Prinz's brilliant new book is a detailed and convincing defense of a fresh variant of the projectionist view, in which emotional responses, particularly approbation and disapprobation, constitute the core content of moral judgments. The view is refined in such a way as to embrace the possibility of moral truth, and answer a large array of objections. Its relativist consequences are embraced, and independently supported with a wide range of psychological and anthropological evidence. Prinz shows, however, that even full fledged relativism does not exclude viable notions of moral debate and moral progress." more

Add comment (0)

More Articles...

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 372

Chat Box

Latest Message: 2 months, 1 week ago

YadaYada : I would think that you can prevent this by locking the threadname input field on edit and responses.
YadaYada : threads without "re: " are misaddressed by the system and become lost!
twpatry : That was supposed to be spoon
twpatry : Nothing more for now.
twpatry : Joke #1: Confucius say: To stab a man with fork is pointless.
twpatry : Deep thought #1: Being a gold-digger was easier before the invention of Viagra.
lorsban : Hello hello! not liking what I see here.
Motorcyclist : Wow, some familiar names. I got some random notice that Leo had posted a week or two ago and dropped in today. Thought this place was indeed toast, Zero. Regards to TD, and best wishes for a speedy recovery to TL
ThoughtFox : Guess salt doesn't work?
Zero : What a total joke. I thought we'd salted the ground over this place.
talking_dog : Good bettering, as the Danes say. ;-)
TimeLine : I really don't miss this place, I automatically transmogrify to nasty when I log in. I may read to some fiction books and get off this laptop. ciao bello...
talking_dog : damn. sorry to hear it, man. hope that doesn't last too long...
TimeLine : I had a car accident and am not allowed to move. I... am... going... mad...
TimeLine : Philosophical recipes; Marxist buns (great for those long nights sitting in the library), Wittgenstein Stew (complex but extremely tasty), and Dworkin Sweet Potato Soup (for some liberal nourishment)
talking_dog : did look tasty...
TimeLine : I found the sugar free vegan chocolate apple cake rather useful, actually...
talking_dog : crikey but it's a mess in here
talking_dog : lots of bots
talking_dog : and bots
talking_dog : spam spam spam egg and spam
talking_dog : ...wicked SNR up in here...
TimeLine : Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity...
myriadshalak : Hi. Site looks good. Can't see all the icons on my xoom though. Maybe the new Firefox for android will make a difference. Oh, why can't the spammers stay outta here?
ThoughtFox : I'mmmm baaacckk. Wahey!!!

Only registered users are allowed to post

Online

Show All

Latest Comments

Common Law Theory
This book is actually not that great. The point ab...
Public Reason
Let me speak of that which I "Know", and that is t...
Science, Religion, God, and Philosophy
I sometimes think that "real science" is just a ph...

From our forums

Quotables

Public Reason

Common Law Theory

The Emotional Construction of Morals

Chat Box

Online

Latest Comments

Philosophy Forums

Philosophy and ... Forums

Political Forums

Community