Friday, March 19, 2010
Login

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

 

Members and visitors,

Ephilosopher.com is currently being upgraded and redesigned.  Although we'll monitor and collect many bugs automatically, you can post any problems you notice by commenting on this article (guests too) or this thread in the forum (if you're logged in).

Thanks for your patience,

Ephilosopher team

 

From our forums

Re:Ethical Dilemma – Am I a murderer?1907 views71 repliesErosopher19.3.2010 10:26
Re:Relativist Fallacy1229 views39 repliesErosopher19.3.2010 10:18
Re:Beautiful Dead Science156 views4 repliesleonardomenderes19.3.2010 7:27
Re:Ayn Rand and radical evil3891 views154 repliesSzavieur19.3.2010 4:20
Re:Subjects and Relations1372 views40 repliesSzavieur18.3.2010 15:30
Re: Thucydides and Realpolitik549 views7 repliesKatechon18.3.2010 11:44
Re:Einstein's Relativity as Inconsistency269 views6 repliesPentcho17.3.2010 5:45
Re:Kuhnian Revolutions371 views8 repliesPentcho17.3.2010 3:07
More...

ephilosopher.com is a web community dedicated to philosophical thinking.

Ephilosopher site relaunch

News - announcements

Members and visitors,

Ephilosopher.com is currently being upgraded and redesigned.  Although we'll monitor and collect many bugs automatically, you can post any problems you notice by commenting on this article.

Thanks for your patience,

Ephilosopher team

 

The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws

News - reviews

Markus Schrenk, The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws, Ontos, 2007, 192pp., $79.00 (hbk), ISBN 9783938793428 Max Kistler: "The question is whether laws of nature can have exceptions. There seems to be an urgent need for a concept of laws that allow for exceptions, particularly so as to understand so-called special sciences like biology or psychology. Certain dysfunctional haemoglobin molecules, such as haemoglobin M, do not form bonds with oxygen, although it is a law of biochemistry that haemoglobin does form such bonds (see p. 136). The challenge is to understand how a universal generalisation can express a law and nevertheless be compatible with exceptions. This seems paradoxical: it is generally considered to be necessary for a statement to express a law of nature that it be strictly universal and true. " more
   

Conference: Neutrality and Theory of Law

News - law

Jordi Ferrer, professor of legal phylosophy at the University of Girona (Spain) is organizing a conference celebrating the 50th volume of the series Philosophy and Law, published by Marcial Pons Publisher, which he co-edits together with Professor Jos Juan Moreso (University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona). The website of the congress is the following: http://www.filosofiayderecho.es/congreso/en/index.html The congress, devoted to the topic Neutrality and Theory of Law, will take place the 20th, 21st and 22nd of May 2010 in the Spanish city of Girona. The conference is conceived of as a meeting place for authors and readers of our books and topics. For this reason twelve authors from the collection will be speakers at the event Dr. Robert Alexy, Dr. Juan C. Bayón, Dr. Brian Bix, Dr. Eugenio Bulygin, Dr. Bruno Celano, Dr. Jules L. Coleman, Dr. Riccardo Guastini, Dr. Brian Leiter, Dr. Jorge Luis Rodríguez, Dr. Frederick Schauer, Dr. Scott J. Shapiro, Dr. Wilfrid J. Waluchow. Our objective is to offer an event of great importance in the legal-philosophical debate that will gather and try to bridge different legal traditions.
   

New Essay on the "Nothing to Hide" Argument

News - law

reserved_for_seo_keywords Professor Daniel J. Solove (George Washington University Law School) has posted a short essay on SSRN entitled "I've Got Nothing to Hide" and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy.  The essay is available here: http://ssrn.com/abstract=998565 Abstract:

In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the "nothing to hide" argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the "nothing to hide" argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The "nothing to hide" argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the "nothing to hide" argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.

The essay contains a brief survey of Solove's theory of privacy, which it applies to the "nothing to hide" argument. [[b]Submitted by solove[/b]]
   

CBC Podcasts: How to think about science"

News - science

reserved_for_seo_keywords If science is neither cookery, nor angelic virtuosity, then what is it? Modern societies have tended to take science for granted as a way of knowing, ordering and controlling the world. Everything was subject to science, but science itself largely escaped scrutiny. This situation has changed dramatically in recent years. Historians, sociologists, philosophers and sometimes scientists themselves have begun to ask fundamental questions about how the institution of science is structured and how it knows what it knows. David Cayley talks to some of the leading lights of this new field of study. Please note all programs will be available to listen to again in real audio after the episode has aired. Go to http://www.cbc.ca/podcasting/index.html?newsandcurrent#thinkaboutscience  for the podcast versions of the series. http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/features/science/index.html [[b]Submitted by Telos[/b]]
   

Out of Body Experience Recreated with Virtual Reality Goggles

News - science

reserved_for_seo_keywords BBC: "The experiments, described in the Science journal, offer a scientific explanation for a phenomenon experienced by one in 10 people. Two teams used virtual reality goggles to con the brain into thinking the body was located elsewhere. The visual illusion plus the feel of their real bodies being touched made volunteers sense that they had moved outside of their physical bodies. The researchers say their findings could have practical applications, such as helping take video games to the next level of virtuality so the players feel as if they are actually inside the game. Clinically, surgeons might also be able to perform operations on patients thousands of miles away by controlling a robotic virtual self. " more.
   

Page 1 of 183

Headlines

  • Finitism in Geometry
    [Revised entry by Jean Paul Van Bendegem on March 17, 2010. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, figure1.png] In our representations of the world, especially in physics, (mathematical) infinities play a crucial role. The continuum of the real numbers, r, as a representation of time or of one-dimensional space is surely the best known example and, by extension, the n-fold cartesian product, rn, for n-dimensional...
  • Alfred Schutz
    [Revised entry by Michael Barber on March 16, 2010. Changes to: Bibliography] Alfred Schutz, more than any other phenomenologist, attempted to relate the thought of Edmund Husserl to the social world and the social sciences. His Phenomenology of the Social World supplied philosophical foundations for Max Weber's sociology and for economics, with which he was familiar through contacts with colleagues of the Austrian school. When Schutz fled Hitler's Anschluss of...

Quotables

As we shall see, the concept of time has no meaning before the beginning of the universe. This was first pointed out by St. Augustine. When asked: What did God do before he created the universe? Augustine didn't reply: He was preparing Hell for people who asked such questions. Instead, he said that time was a property of the universe that God created, and that time did not exist before the beginning of the universe. - A Brief History of Time -- Stephen Hawking

Online

3 users and 2465 guests online

Chat Box

Latest Message: 7 hours, 41 minutes ago
  • leonardomend : one who does this hopes to capture the success or righteousness of the target when they become more like it through imitating wants.
  • leonardomend : msafwan, you are describing your drifting desires. they may or may not be mimetic. 'mimetic' desire is desires you give yourself to imitate those of an idol or an ideal
  • Erosopher : this is probably better suited to a thread now
  • Msafwan : err.. I don't know... I don't understand mimetic desire. (I was just hoping for feedback.)
  • Msafwan : My point is: (sometimes) I don't feel like copying 'myself' at all... hence it is PROBABLY not 'mimetic desire'.
  • Msafwan : To do this is simple; write what you want to do in a easy to find substance, like your phone. Then you must... somehow forgot about it, then re-'found' it, see if you want to do it or not.
  • Msafwan : The reason I do this is because; the state that we are when writing the checklist is not same as the state when we forgot about it. Which made us wonder... if what we once like to do, is truely what we are happy to do (now).
  • Msafwan : I tried testing "my true desire" by writing a checklist on my phone (it describe what I like to do), then I forgot about it, then I re-visit it... The result is; I don't feel like doing it anymore.
  • Erosopher : Depending on how mind control is being used here all acts demanded by the will could be described that way. Brain washing and mind-control both have extremely negative connotations that I think are misleading; I can deal with that however.
  • Szavieur : Kant's explanation is that the self we're true to is not *exactly* the same as our inclined one. Changing our inclinations IS mind-control in a sense, but not an invidious one.
  • Erosopher : I'm not saying you're a nihilist anyway, but it does seem to suggest that we aren't thinking the same thing by 'duty'
  • Erosopher : The alternative is to try to see an external command as issued from us. This would actually be mimetic, but oddly, we would be wanting to become nature. This is what it is to be a nihilist.
  • Erosopher : I think duty is misunderstood here since we identify our duty as ours and issuing from us. Insofar as we identify with our duty, which we do, being virtuous is exactly following the call to "be true to yourself"
  • leonardomend : And saying making yourself into someone happy with duty makes you happy with duty is an endorsement of mind control.
  • leonardomend : It nullifies things like "be true to yourself", because you are erasing your self and becoming another self. You are in fact not yourself anymore.
  • leonardomend : It is called "mimetic desire" that you want to feel like someone who wants a certain thing. The desire to change your mind.
  • leonardomend : It is called
  • Erosopher : Not very scary to be free and happy.
  • leonardomend : nature to be someone who is naturally happy with duty because being true to yourself when you are that kind of self is happiness? How scary that is.
  • leonardomend : We should change our
  • Fence : Heheh. Great icon, AlwaysAlready. Recognized the little dude immediately.
  • Msafwan : and do the 'meaning' instead.
  • Msafwan : I hope we know WHY we want to do happy thing -and do that. Being happy per se, is pointless. We should find meaning to happiness.
  • Erosopher : Happiness is a good, so it makes sense that we would want it. Being happy being moral would be something that would benefit anybody. That's why I expressed it as a matter of fact.
  • leonardomend : Ah: "mimetic desire"

Only registered users are allowed to post

Community Poll

What is the "hottest" area in philosophy now?

Latest Comments

Visitors



Countries

58.6%United States United States
9.5%United Kingdom United Kingdom
8.8%Canada Canada
5%Australia Australia
2.3%India India

Visitors

Today: 490
Yesterday: 614
This Week: 3169
Last Week: 5451
This Month: 14374
Last Month: 814
Total: 23873


Users

Users

Most active users today from total of 13:
Szavieur, Erosopher, leonardomenderes, Fence, neither/nor, creativesoul, Big Picture Dave, memo, JJpregler, Pentcho, Motorcyclist, YadaYada, Anar

Login Form